By: Robert Avsec, Executive Fire Officer
My wife—and by proxy me as well—is a huge fan of the crime procedurals that have dominated television in recent years, e.g., NCIS, the entire CSI (and the NY and Miami spin-offs). A common theme I hear every week is one of the characters telling one of their colleagues (who’s usually letting some emotion get in the way of logic), “Follow the evidence.”
How well are we in the Fire & EMS business doing at “following the evidence”?
According to a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fact Sheet, U.S. fire departments responded to an estimated average of 371,700 home structure fires per year during 2006-2010. These fires caused an annual average of 2,590 civilian fire deaths, 2,910 civilian fire injuries, and $7.2 billion in direct damage. 92% of all structure fire deaths resulted from home fires. On average, seven people died in U.S. home fires per day during the period.
So What Should We Do?
For starters, we must realize that we cannot eliminate fires, and the resultant deaths and injuries, completely. Not going to happen. At least not until we identify the “stupid” gene in people that leads them to do incredibly dumb things that cause fire. There, I said it. (To quote one of my favorite comics, Ron White, “You can’t fix stupid!”
Civilian Fire Injuries in Residential Buildings (2008-2010)
In the 1960’s, our society finally had enough of the deaths and destruction from automobile crashes on the highways and by-ways of America. The United States Congress—which used to do its job in things like this!—enacted the National Traffic and Motor Safety Act in 1966:
The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act was enacted in the United States in 1966 to empower the federal government to set and administer new safety standards for motor vehicles and road traffic safety. The Act created the National Highway Safety Bureau (now National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). The Act was one of a number of initiative by the government in response to increasing number of cars and associated fatalities and injuries on the road following a period when the number of people killed on the road had increased 6-fold and the number of vehicles was up 11-fold since 1925.
The reduction of the rate of death attributable to motor-vehicle crashes in the United States represents the successful public health response to a great technologic advance of the 20th century—the motorization of America.
How did it happen? We took a systematic approach to solving the problem that resulted in changes such as:
- Birth of the modern trauma care and the Emergency Medical Services in the United States;
- Engineering changes to automobiles to protect occupants: lap/shoulder belt restraint systems; air bag restraint systems; energy-absorbing steering columns; vehicle chassis construction that dissipates crash energy to protect vehicle occupants;
- Improved road construction design that included: guard rails to prevent vehicles from striking stationary objects, e.g., bridge embutments, and vehicles from leaving the road, e.g., tight curves, and crossing into on-coming traffic.
So Why Aren’t We Taking the Same Approach to Preventable Fires?
Figure 2. The Kitchen/Cooking Area accounts for the highest percentage of both fires and fire injuries. Though they only account for a combined 11% of all fires, the Bedroom and Living Areas (Living room, Family Room, or Den) are where 49% of fire deaths occur.
If we took the same approach to reducing the number of fires and their impact on our society we’d push for changes like these:
Action Item: All residential cooking equipment manufactured and installed in homes would come equipped with a fire suppression system installed, e.g., a hood suppression system. That system would also shut down the fuel supply to the equipment upon activation of the system.
Impact: The greatest source of fires, in the most frequent location of origin (43%), would be “stopped in its tracks”: (1) in its incipient stage before it could spread; and (2) occupant’s would not be injured (38% of fire injuries) attempting to extinguish the fire or attempting to remove a burning pot from the stove.
Action Item: Require the installation of partial residential sprinkler coverage in all living areas (living room, family room, and den) and in all bedrooms.
Impact: Fires would be controlled in their incipient stage in the residential areas that account for the greatest percentage of civilian fire deaths (combined 49%) and second leading area for civilian fire injuries (combined 33%).
These are just two that immediately come to mind when looking at the stats in Figures 1 and 2 above. But if we could be successful in doing this, in a generation or two we could have a substantial positive impact on:
- The Number of Fires (53% that occur in kitchen/cooking areas and living areas);
- The Number of Civilian Fire Deaths (64% that occur in kitchen/cooking areas and living areas); and
- The Number of Civilian Fire Injuries (68% that occur in kitchen/cooking areas and living areas.
Sound rather harsh? Sound unrealistic? Consider for a moment what has happened since 9/11 to fight the “war on terror” — creation of DHS and TSA, hundreds of billions of dollars spent, laws adopted and changed, new training, new equipment, and new ways to do our jobs. With all that and more, we’ve not suffered a single terrorist-related death or injury on United States soil since that day. We have, however, lost a “city” of 30,966 people (total U.S. fire deaths for 2002-2011) in that same period.
Something to think about, no?
Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center. http://www.usfa.fema.gov/statistics/reports/casualties.shtm
Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center. Fire Death Rate Trends: An International Perspective. http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/statistics/internat.pdf
Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society (1966). http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9978&page=11